🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to reinitiate atomic talks with the United States on condition that it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has declared.

The Iranian diplomat stated solely negotiations worked, and shared new appeals had come from intermediaries to reopen discussions with the American leadership. He claimed Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to permit the global atomic watchdog to visit bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Walking a Complex Path

Araghchi is navigating a difficult path since Iran wishes not to appear to be acting from a situation of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged more powerful militarily and psychologically from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to enrich uranium domestically that it will always maintain" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Talks Unexpectedly Ended

The prior phases of talks between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and bitter end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with the US president declaring the locations had been destroyed. Subsequently, EU nations used their privilege to restore global restrictions, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Proposed

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was settled an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be confident that Iran's enrichment initiative was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the discussions that American atomic experts could function inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Officials claimed on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the deal to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Present Position

Iran's diplomats said the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be resurrected in certain ways if talks resume.

The American leader recently claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to restart talks, but in private Tehran representatives say they are not yet getting clear proposals from America either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been criticized of inactivity in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran asserts negotiations is not part of a performance.

Political Position

In his remarks to the conference, designed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the notion of international law, Araghchi stated the two-week conflict demonstrated the clash could not be resolved by combat operations. He said the strikes started with a Washington's ultimatum for an complete Tehran capitulation and concluded with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with complete American awareness and cooperation, making faith challenging to reestablish.

Negotiations Continues the Final Solution

The foreign minister stated: "It was not Iran that had abandoned negotiations; it was the United States and the European states that had consistently attempted to dictate their will during the discussions. Negotiations can still be active and stays the final resolution to address disputes, but its criteria, rules and tenets must be adhered to."

"In case they speak to the Iranian people with the approach of respect and honor, they will get a response in the equivalent tone."

Restoration and Rebuilding

In what is portrayed by Tehran representatives as the conflict of repair and reconstruction, the foreign minister claimed he was confident Iran's military capacities "are considerably enhanced than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We learned many lessons from this engagement; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He added: "We managed to survive this war. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to destroy, stays intact. The sites and gear, if destroyed, will be rebuilt; what is important is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they sought to undermine, but were unable to destroy. The Iranian people have become more resilient, more integrated, and more supportive of the government and the state in the aftermath of this assault."