🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold move to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Officials, child protection groups, and guardians are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for countries abroad.

Across Europe Trend

In Europe, a rising group of nations are moving toward parallel bans.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for under-15s, with the PM stating that phones and platforms are "stealing our children's innocence". Legislation may be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to protect children from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media account holders. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban remains "an tools on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has asked lawmakers to pass a law increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has suggested a comparable action, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The government in The Dutch government has urged parents to restrict their children from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory motion demanding a ban for minors unless guardian approval is given. Even though it warns of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the resolution does not enact binding law.

"A strong age restriction is a solid first step," commented a leading parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Eye

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a future ban, stating that "no measure is discarded" but insisting any policy must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Earlier, interest gathered behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the government committed to further research the issue.

Charities have voiced warnings. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after viewing disturbing online content suggests that a simple age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of harm when users reach the legal age.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the tech sector to design platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for young users," said a leading child protection advocate.

America: A Fragmented Picture

In the United States, regulation is primarily unfolding at the state government level amid country-wide gridlock.

• The state of Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has signed a measure prohibiting those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has passed a rule capping teenagers to one hour of social media access per day, with additional use requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted bills demanding guardian approval for under-16s to create social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from various individuals to copy Australia's path, a US-wide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Perspectives

Apart from the West, further countries are also taking action.

• The Malaysian government aims to ban social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, international agencies take a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has warned that social media bans have downsides and "might have unintended consequences". The body points out that the internet can be a "lifeline" for isolated young people and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to invest in user protection.

Even as this worldwide discussion continues, the actions of the Australian government and several other countries demonstrate that states internationally are less and less content to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.